LearnChoosing a program

Prop Firm Scaling Plans, Account Merging and Maximum Allocation

Capital scaling increases an account's approved allocation, merging combines eligible accounts, and maximum allocation sets a ceiling across a defined group of accounts. Each answers a different question. Before requesting a change, establish the new loss thresholds, payout terms and trading permissions, as well as the headline balance.

Prop Firm WizCFD/FX and FuturesPublished Sources checked 10 min read

On this page

A larger account can have less remaining loss room than it held before a profit withdrawal. A merger can also remove access to a future scaling plan. The useful comparison is between the complete account states before and after the change.

What is actually growing or being combined?

TermWhat it changes or limitsWhat it does not establish
Capital scalingThe account allocation or starting-balance reference increases after specified conditionsThe new loss room, position cap or cash payable to you
Account mergingEligible accounts become one account under the provider's merger rulesThat old permissions, payout progress or scaling rights survive
Maximum allocationA total defined by account stage, trader, household, strategy or another stated scopeHow much any one account may lose
Account-count limitThe number of accounts allowed within a stated scopeA dollar allocation or shared loss buffer

Read the unit whenever a firm uses the word “scaling.” In a futures program, it may refer to an increase in permitted contracts. That is the subject of the futures contract-scaling guide. This article focuses on capital changes and account consolidation.

Also preserve the distinction between an allocation, a trading balance and withdrawable money. Where the account is simulated, a scale-up does not by itself create a live brokerage account or transfer that capital to you. The account-size guide explains why the advertised amount is not your loss allowance.

What must happen before a scale-up?

Read a scaling plan as a set of eligibility conditions followed by a defined account change. Record the profit measure, required time or activity, payout milestones, eligible plans and whether scaling requires a request. A profit target alone may be insufficient.

For FTMO's CFD Scaling Plan, eligibility covers FTMO Accounts obtained through its 1-Step or 2-Step Challenge, excluding Instant Accounts. The published conditions include at least four months under the same order, at least 10% net simulated profit above starting balance within the prior four months, two processed Rewards in that period, and a positive balance at scale-up. It describes a 25% increase and a $2 million ceiling across FTMO Accounts. The plan also gives 2-Step accounts a 90% share of simulated profits, so a scale-up can change payout terms as well as the balance. These are conditional milestones, not a forecast of growth. FTMO Scaling Plan.

Then establish what the increase is calculated from: the original allocation, the current scaled allocation, a fixed dollar addition or a published tier table. Record the basis for the next profit target separately. An increase amount and a qualifying-profit target can use different references.

Alpha Capital's published scaling example shows why individual settings need checking. Its first step moves a $100,000 starting balance to $110,000; the next account state lists $11,000 max drawdown, but the first scale does not increase the maximum lot size. Its eligible-plan list is Alpha Pro, Swing and Three. The process requires profits to be withdrawn before the new account is issued, with five trading days required before its first performance fee. Alpha Capital Scaling Plan.

Meeting a milestone is not the same event as the new parameters becoming active. Until the change is confirmed, use the account state actually in force.

What can an account merger change?

A merger changes the unit to which rules apply. Before it happens, two accounts have separate balances and loss tests. Adding their balances in a spreadsheet does not let one account borrow another's unused loss room. After an approved merger, the resulting account follows the resulting account's rules. The multiple-account worked example illustrates why separate buffers cannot be pooled informally.

Check eligibility before comparing benefits. Relevant conditions can include the account stage, product, currency, platform, add-ons, open positions, current balance and whether a trading cycle has finished. A permission to hold several accounts does not establish permission to merge them.

FTMO's CFD merger FAQ limits merging to FTMO Accounts from the same product and base currency that are unused; it says a Reward withdrawal can satisfy the unused-account condition after trading has begun. The combined account receives adjusted drawdown limits, and the merge is irreversible. Mixing Swing and Standard produces Standard; some larger Swing combinations also require Standard. That can make account-type permissions part of the decision. FTMO merging conditions.

Alpha Capital's Qualified Analyst merger rules require the same account type and platform, initial balances rather than profit or drawdown, and a combined pre-scaling size no higher than $300,000. Accounts in the Focused Trader Group cannot be merged; Alpha's scaling page says they must return to normal leverage first. The rules also state that merged accounts cannot be scaled, and vice versa. For bi-weekly accounts, the withdrawal date is available 14 days after trading starts, with at least five trading days required before the first withdrawal. Alpha Capital merging rules. Check plan exclusions too: Alpha Direct cannot be merged or scaled. Alpha Capital terms, Alpha Direct.

FundedNext's CFD merger FAQ describes merging FundedNext Accounts up to $300,000, subject to its challenge-model, platform, cycle and add-on conditions. The merged account takes the lower reward share, and already-scaled accounts cannot be merged. It also excludes merged accounts from FundedNext Pro. FundedNext merging rules. The Pro Scale-Up page confirms that exclusion. Challenge-reward treatment depends on the applicable purchase/reset cohort, so do not transfer a legacy account's benefit to a new one.

These examples make the choice concrete: fewer accounts may be easier to operate, but the resulting account can lose a benefit or start a new payout clock. Establish which change matters for your own accounts before requesting a merger.

Which maximum allocation applies?

A headline maximum needs a counting rule. Write down what counts, whose accounts count, when it is tested and whether the figure applies before or after scaling. The limit on buying evaluations can differ from the limit on active funded-stage accounts.

Scoped official examplePublished limit relevant to this comparison
FTMO, CFD account FAQ$400,000 per trader or strategy before scaling, across the accounts and products covered by that FAQ; Premium Programme benefits can increase it. Account limits
Alpha Capital, Qualified Analyst accounts$400,000 per household before capital growth, alongside a $300,000 asset-based strategy limit. Allocation rules
Tradeify, futures Simulated Funded AccountsUp to five active accounts per individual and per household, including the listed Growth, Select and Lightning Funded types. This is an account count. Simulated funded account limits

Alpha's detailed rule also addresses correlated instruments used for the same simultaneous trade idea. Different symbols are not a blanket exemption. Use its full examples to establish scope rather than treating “strategy” as a definition you can choose yourself.

Merging two $100,000 allocations into one $200,000 allocation leaves the same stated total. It does not, by arithmetic alone, create extra allocation headroom. Similarly, passing another evaluation need not make another funded account available immediately.

Check allocation eligibility separately from copying permissions. The automation and copying permission record covers who operates the accounts, the tools involved and the permitted account connections.

Worked example: a larger account with less remaining loss room

The following hypothetical USD example illustrates a payout followed by capital scaling. It is not any named firm's plan.

Assume all positions are closed, with no floating P&L, trading-account credit, fees or other adjustments. Equity therefore equals balance. The original starting reference is $100,000. Overall max loss is a static 10% of that reference, so the original equity threshold is $90,000. Touching or falling below the threshold would terminate the account. No breach occurs in this sequence.

The account has earned $4,000. The provider debits all $4,000 of profit for the reward, with an 80% trader share of $3,200; the other $800 is the provider's share. The account debit is $4,000, not $3,200. The model has no transfer charges and does not model receipt timing.

After that debit, an approved scale-up credits $25,000 and resets the starting reference to $125,000. The model explicitly retains the 10% overall max-loss rule against this new reference. It leaves the maximum position cap unchanged. Daily limits, margin requirements and payout eligibility are separate checks outside this calculation.

The 25% step matches the increases FTMO and FundedNext Pro publish, but those two scaling pages do not specify how loss limits or position limits change after a scale-up. Alpha Capital's example does show its maximum drawdown following the new balance. Here, the new threshold and the unchanged cap are this example's assumptions, not any firm's rule.

Account fieldBefore rewardAfter reward debitAfter scale-up
Starting reference used by this rule$100,000$100,000$125,000
Balance and equity$104,000$100,000$125,000
Overall equity threshold$90,000$90,000$112,500
Remaining max-loss buffer$14,000$10,000$12,500
Maximum position capUnchangedUnchangedUnchanged

Use the current threshold at each step:

Remaining max-loss buffer = monitored equity − current overall threshold

After scaling, the threshold is $125,000 × 90% = $112,500. The remaining buffer is $125,000 − $112,500 = $12,500. Subtracting the old $90,000 threshold would incorrectly suggest $35,000 of room.

Hypothetical account transition. Before the reward, equity is $104,000, the overall threshold is $90,000 and the buffer is $14,000. After the reward debit, the buffer is $10,000. After scaling, equity is $125,000, the threshold is $112,500 and the buffer is $12,500.
The scale-up adds $2,500 of max-loss room compared with the post-reward state. The final buffer is still $1,500 below the pre-reward buffer because the earlier profit was removed.

This is why both comparison points matter. The scale-up increased the defined loss allowance, while the full payout-and-scaling sequence ended with less remaining buffer than before the payout. For other withdrawal treatments, use the post-payout buffer guide. A trailing rule needs its own current reference and lock state, explained in the overall max-loss guide.

Check your understanding · Optional
A different hypothetical scale-up takes equity from $100,000 to $125,000, and its confirmed new overall threshold is $115,000. The old threshold was $90,000. All positions are closed. What is the remaining max-loss buffer under this different rule?

What should you record before and after the change?

Keep a before-and-after record for the actual account, including the terms that authorize the change. The evaluation-to-funded checklist uses the same approach at an earlier stage.

Field to confirmBefore the requestBefore the next trade
Account identity and scopeProgram, stage, currency, platform, add-ons and purchase/reset cohortResulting account, simulation/live status and applicable account type
Profit and cash movementsEligible profit, requested account debit, reward share and pending amountsActual debit, scaling credit, retained profit, balance, equity and separate credit
Loss rulesCurrent daily and overall references, thresholds and remaining buffersNew dollar thresholds, update timing, equality rule and any trail/lock reset
Trading capacity and permissionsCurrent lots/contracts, leverage, instruments, news/holding and automation conditionsEach confirmed change or confirmed unchanged condition
Payout and scaling progressQualifying days, cycles, milestones and existing scaling eligibilityWhich counts restart, next request conditions, reward share and future scaling rights
Allocation and activationOther active accounts and applicable trader/household/strategy totalsPost-change totals, approval, effective time and confirmation that the new settings are active

Do not fill an undocumented setting by multiplying the old one by the balance increase. Record it as unresolved. Ask a specific question such as: “After the reward debit and this scale-up or merge, what will my starting reference, overall and daily thresholds, position cap, next payout conditions and scaling eligibility be?” Include the account references and the precise proposed change.

If the agreement and help page differ, first check their scope, dates and any stated precedence. Keep unresolved differences visible using the official-rule conflict record.

Before requesting the change, complete the left column. Before trading the resulting account, reconcile the right column with the activated account and applicable rules. A higher displayed balance answers only one part of that check.

Sources and method

Official pages checked on 13 October 2026. The examples above identify the relevant market and account stage; they are not a complete comparison of these firms or permission for a particular account.

The transition ledger, figure and knowledge check are original hypothetical illustrations, independently calculated from their stated assumptions. They do not model a named firm, predict growth or payouts, or recommend a position size. The worked buffer is distance to one specified overall loss boundary, not a combined allowance under every account rule.